FATCA & Hold All Mail

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act and Hold All Mail

By now, most major financial institutions and service providers are winding up the review of their client base to ensure that undocumented US centric clients are properly identified as it relates to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and its regulations.

From our own experience, this exercise allowed us to reconfirm that our clients were still non U.S. persons by obtaining new W8-BEN forms. However, we found examples of third party power holders and beneficiaries that were deemed US resident for FATCA purposes and these persons were properly documented by obtaining new W9 forms.

In an attempt to cure all inferences of US indicia, we reviewed all of our customers mailing addresses. Many of whom had Hold All Mail (HAM) addresses in the U.S. to assist with the copious amounts of mail sent to each client monthly. This inference of U.S. residency had to be cured to eliminate any doubt of the client being a non U.S. person. The cure process involved sending a letter to the client to have them confirm that the U.S. HAM address was only being used to facilitate the management of mail.

As an alternative to a US HAM address, we recommended the FidPro Hold All Mail Service, one of few Hold All Mail providers not located in the U.S. FidPro Hold All Mail clients did not require a cure letter. This turned out to be a significant saving for the firm and our clients were not required to send followup confirmation.

If there is an indication that your client is a US person, this should be explained. In the absence of a plausible explanation for the US indicia, you may want to recommend to your client that they seek independent tax advice to confirm their status before the 17th of August 2015.

For all Bahamian Financial Institutions or BFI’s the local FATCA Portal can be accessed here.

On International Business Companies or IBCs as Split Share Companies

The Split Share International Business Company (IBC)

A Bahamian International Business Company or IBC can be used as a split share company that is both effective and affordable to administer.

The process for creating a split share company involves amending the Articles and Memorandums of the IBC so that the Ordinary shares of the company represents the future income and/ or any type of future gain of the structure and the Preferred shares represent the existing assets and liabilities that are treated as capital.

The IBC can also be split into the same class of shares as indicated above but instead of income and capital, the shares are used to delineate between a charitable purpose (ordinary shares) and a directed purpose (preferred shares).

In both examples, the setup of the IBC represents a form of planning that can shelter clients against tax exposure as well as provide succession planning. A revocable, fully directed trust owns the redeemable, preferred shares corresponding to the capital of the company, and a second irrevocable, discretionary trust is used to hold the ordinary shares corresponding to the income.

The “Split” between the income and capital of the company via issuance of different classes of shares, theoretically allows the client to segregate himself from the income generated by the holding company.

Provided that the client has fully relinquished control and benefit of such income (due to the irrevocable trust), neither the settlor or beneficiaries are subject to tax reporting obligations in their home country. I.e. No income tax reporting obligation until receipt of an income distribution.

In summary, as long as the Trustee retains full discretion on the income trust, there are no tax or reporting obligations in most jurisdictions.

On the Topic of Automatic Trust Disclosure by Fiduciaries.

Automatic Disclosure Vs Liability

Whilst most fiduciaries are willing to provide information such as trust instruments and bank account information to the donor and beneficiaries, there is a general reluctance to disclose any other information or documents to anyone else unless required by law.

The general practice is to request written approval from the donor prior to dissemination of information regardless of who the recipient might be. In yesterday’s world, the words “bank secrecy” were used as an attribute when describing reasons for establishing an offshore trust. After time, the word “confidentiality” was perceived to be more politically correct. In today’s world, anything to do with secrecy and confidentiality is discouraged.

The industry has moved toward transparency with emphasis on clients who are reporting and are compliant in their home jurisdictions. However, as tax laws change, many clients find themselves on the wrong side of the tax code almost overnight. When this happens, fiduciaries run the precarious gauntlet of disclosing clients to regulators or risk a legal battle by which the client sues for breach of confidentiality. This is why an important feature of any trust is a disclosure clause that allows the trustee to forward information to regulators with out fear of reprisal.

When disclosure without consent is imminent, trustees often seek a Beddoe Order. The order protects the trustees against claims by beneficiaries who suggest that an action should not have been brought and enables the trustees to recover the costs from the trust property.

Moral of the story, check your trust deed and review the clause on the duty to disclose…

The FidPro Blog

Tag Archives: Detriment to Beneficiary & Donor

FATCA & Hold All Mail

On International Business Companies or IBCs as Split Share Companies

On the Topic of Automatic Trust Disclosure by Fiduciaries.